[AER]⇒ PDF Free Women in Love Penguin Popular Classics D H Lawrence 9780140621617 Books

Women in Love Penguin Popular Classics D H Lawrence 9780140621617 Books

Download As PDF : Women in Love Penguin Popular Classics D H Lawrence 9780140621617 Books

Women in Love Penguin Popular Classics D H Lawrence 9780140621617 Books

This review pertains to the Penguin Classics edition of 2007, with an intro by Amit Chaudhuri. Amazon is coy as to what text is used; it's the Cambridge edition, removing some changes that DHL apparently made under pressure from his publisher.

The book itself is as good as the 5-star reviews say. Lawrence IMHO went a bit unhinged in the 1920s, but Women in Love, like The Rainbow, is a magnificent novel that captures degrees of feeling most novels appear not to even know exist.

(P.S. - good god, Amazon, we can't review novels any more without your silly "how would you describe the plot of this book?" questionnaire? What idiot vice-president thought that up?)


Tags : Women in Love (Penguin Popular Classics) [D. H. Lawrence] on Amazon.com. *FREE* shipping on qualifying offers. Women in Love is widely regarded as D. H. Lawrence's greatest novel. The novel continues where: The Rainbow left off with the third generation of Brangwens: Ursula Brangwen,D. H. Lawrence,Women in Love (Penguin Popular Classics),Penguin Books,014062161X,Classic fiction,General,Literature - Classics Criticism,Literature: Texts,Modern fiction

Women in Love Penguin Popular Classics D H Lawrence 9780140621617 Books Reviews

I was disturbed by the mood swings of the characters, their hyperbolic and sometimes contradictory emotional responses, the sexual ambiguity in some cases.
I did not understand it until I subsequently read The Rainbow. Since I am not a student in an English class I am just reading what I ignored while pursuing a different course of study. It's fun to read these classics when you are well seasoned in the mysteries of life.
Exploring the arousal of interest in another human being and the numerous vulnerabilities one experiences at the onset of a relationship, D.H Lawrence takes his readers on a bumpy ride into the hearts and souls of his heroes. Written in 1920, the book is as true and as fascinating now, almost a hundred years later. From the first couple of pages it swipes a reader off her feet and into the whirling journey of excellent language and attentive descriptions, examining every detail of the bottom of the wast sea of human feelings and thoughts. Studies of the world of nature around the humans add a new fine level to the interconnectedness of all that exists on the pages on the book. Love, friendship, homosexual attraction, creating a family, hate, death, and many more subjects unfold in a variety of patterns, waiting to be discovered anew with every reread of the novel.

Victoria Evangelina
I didn't realize this is not a normal-sized book. It is quite large in size, VERY small type. It reminded me of a coloring book. I am not a senior, but even with my reading glasses I had trouble with the print.
DHLawrence is a master of words. He writes with such brilliance..to read one of his novels is to experience every one of the senses.
A masterpiece I have read several times. It portrays modern relationshiips undergoing stress from cultural alienation. Purposeless societies generate purposeless people, who may cling to each other in endlessly dissatisfying ways to escape anomie. Some couples make it, nevertheless. I disregard the philosophies that characterize the dialogs. This is not a book of ideas. It is a book of yearning distracted by philosophies, personal histories, and social vacuousness. What do men and women really want? Undistracted presence. Lawrence book is a ballet of emotions shoving the dancers across the floor, and even off it. We, like they, are caught up in the dance whose purpose is never to arrive. Dance as play.
Leave aside the ridiculous dialogue. Perhaps there were people who actually spoke like that, although I doubt it. Leave aside the melodramatic, self-indulgent characters. Presumably Lawrence portrays them thus intentionally. And leave aside, I guess, the apparently groundbreaking sexuality that seems to be crucial to securing its place in the canon. I'll even acknowledge Lawrence's great gift for capturing quickly changing moods in the characters' indirect speech.

Focus only on the writing, which is, I admit, intermittently great. It is also intermittently awful. And when it ventures into the latter, it really plumbs the depths. Like that of its predecessor, The Rainbow, the language here is bloated. Time after time, Lawrence uses the same word two or three times in one passage to describe a character's state of mind. I actually sat there a few times and wrote a single sentence that distilled all the blather without losing any content. It wasn't hard.

The intermittent awful cancels out the intermittent great. It's impossible to ignore. I can't give a good rating to a book that so butchers the language, even if it also elevates it. I'm done with D.H. Lawrence. I've given an honest attempt out of respect for the canon but, after slogging through this last one, I just...I can't.
This review pertains to the Penguin Classics edition of 2007, with an intro by Amit Chaudhuri. is coy as to what text is used; it's the Cambridge edition, removing some changes that DHL apparently made under pressure from his publisher.

The book itself is as good as the 5-star reviews say. Lawrence IMHO went a bit unhinged in the 1920s, but Women in Love, like The Rainbow, is a magnificent novel that captures degrees of feeling most novels appear not to even know exist.

(P.S. - good god, , we can't review novels any more without your silly "how would you describe the plot of this book?" questionnaire? What idiot vice-president thought that up?)